Multimodal / Product UXMock demo
ScreenSense QA
A multimodal UX/product QA tool that reviews UI screenshots for accessibility, friction, copy clarity, and visual hierarchy, and returns prioritised, severity-scored recommendations.
Next.jsTypeScriptClaude vision (claude-opus-4-8)Structured outputVercel
At a glance
- ICP
- Solo builders and small teams reviewing landing pages, dashboards, onboarding, and forms before shipping.
- Features
- Upload a screenshot
- Choose a rubric: accessibility, PM, conversion, trust
- Multimodal critique with severity scoring
- UX issues ranked by severity
- Suggested fixes + before/after summary
- Exportable issue backlog
AI architecture
- 1UploadBrowser image upload; never stored without consent.
- 2PreprocessNormalize and validate the image into the pipeline schema.
- 3Multimodal critiqueclaude-opus-4-8 vision analyses the screenshot against a rubric.
- 4Rubric scoringStructured JSON: summary, findings[], recommendations[], risks[], confidence.
- 5Severity rankingFindings ordered by impact so the worst issues surface first.
- 6ReportAnnotated issue list + prioritised recommendations, exportable.
Case study
Product problem
Who has the problem: founders and small teams without a designer. ScreenSense gives them a credible heuristic review in seconds, framed as a prioritised backlog rather than a critique essay.
ICP & MVP scope
ICP: solo builder / small SaaS reviewing key screens. MVP: upload, rubric choice, severity-ranked findings, suggested fixes, export. Out of scope: bounding-box annotation and Figma integration.
Metrics & guardrails
North star: actionable issues found per review. The guardrail, false/unsupported design claims, keeps the tool honest; a confidence field on every finding makes uncertainty visible.
Resume bullets · AI Engineering
- Built a multimodal QA pipeline using Claude vision with a strict structured-output contract (findings, recommendations, risks, confidence).
- Shipped mock-first with fixture critiques so the demo and CI run without a vision API key.
Resume bullets · AI PM
- Framed AI design critique as a prioritised, severity-scored backlog rather than an essay, making it triageable by PMs.
- Defined a quality/guardrail metric pair (issue usefulness vs unsupported design claims) for a multimodal product.